Country tracker · Asia-Pacific · 40 countries, one method
AI in Singapore
How far Singapore has come on AI, and how complete its AI rulebook is: two scores, six lenses, every law linked to its official text.
64.3% of people aged 15–64 used a generative AI product in Q2 2026, up from 58.6% in H1 2025; #2 of the 147 economies Microsoft tracks. Its strongest lens is Talent (#1 of 39) and its weakest Infrastructure (#23). On AI law, there is no AI law or bill; existing regulators apply privacy, consumer and sector rules to ai.
#4 of 40 on Progress40/100 Rulebook5 verified laws and rulesChecked 21 Oct 2026
In the Record’s memory4 dated events since January 2023, by month and kind. Darker means busier; choose a square to see those events.
See all 4 in the ledger →Singapore through six lenses
How the scores work →The same six lenses, in the same order, on every country page. Each shows its lead number, the rank among the countries the source covers, and every indicator behind the lens score. 16 of 17 indicators measure Singapore.
01Adoption#2 of 40
How widely are people and firms using AI?
64.3%
share of people aged 15–64 who used generative AI, Q2 2026
H1 2025Q2 2026Lens score77
- AI user shareQ2 2026 · Microsoft AI Diffusion64.3%#2 of 147
- Use AI at work2025 · University of Melbourne and KPMG International64%#14 of 47
- AI job postings2025 · Lightcast4.7%#1 of 22
- AI literacy index2025 · LinkedIn60#14 of 46
02Talent#1 of 39
Does it have, and keep, the people?
1.8%
of LinkedIn members count as AI talent, 2025
Lens score65
- AI talent share2025 · LinkedIn1.8%#2 of 15
- AI skill penetration2015–2025 · LinkedIn1.43×#9 of 15
- Top AI authors2025 · Zeki Data6,611#14 of 21
- AI authors per 100k2025 · Zeki Data110#2 of 15
- AI talent net flow2025 · LinkedIn+0.90#12 of 50
03Research#9 of 40
Does it build AI and its science?
16
notable AI models, 2003–2025
Lens score49
- Notable models2003–2025 · Epoch AI16#8 of 33
- AI patents per 100k2024 · AI Index1.31#6 of 15
04Investment#10 of 40
Is private money flowing in?
$1.8B
private AI investment, 2025
Lens score50
- Private AI investment2025 · Quid$1.8B#11 of 15
- Investment since 20132013–2025 · Quid$9.1B#10 of 15
- New AI companies2025 · Quid288#11 of 15
05Infrastructure#23 of 40
Does it have the machines?
1,135
H100-equivalents of known AI supercomputer capacity in operation, Oct 2026
Lens score27
- AI computeOct 2026 · Epoch AI GPU Clusters1,135#26 of 33
- Data centres2025 · Cloudscene99#19 of 97
- Robots installed2024 · International Federation of Robotics (IFR)—below the top 10
06Laws#22 of 40 verified
How complete and binding is its AI rulebook?
40/100
Rulebook score · Existing regulators, no AI statute
Rulebook40
- Binding laws and rules in forceverified2
- Items in the law registerverified51 awaiting checks
- Governance initiatives endorsed2019–2025 · AI Index5of 8
AI law in Singapore
How to check a law →Singapore has no general AI law; it relies on voluntary IMDA frameworks, including an agentic-AI edition from January 2026, plus election-deepfake and online-harms statutes.
Existing regulators, no AI statuteNo AI law or bill; existing regulators apply privacy, consumer and sector rules to AI.
- Partly in forceLaw · bindingAdopted 5 Nov 2025 · In force from 29 Jun 2026
Online Safety (Relief and Accountability) Act 2025
Creates a Commissioner of Online Safety and Online Safety Commission that can order takedowns or account restrictions, plus statutory torts against posters, administrators and platforms; first phase covers 5 of 13 harms (intimate image abuse, image-based child abuse, doxxing, online harassment, online stalking).
- VoluntaryGuidance · not bindingAdopted 22 Jan 2026
Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI
Voluntary guidance on risk bounding, human accountability, technical controls and end-user responsibility for AI agents.
- In forceLaw · bindingAdopted 15 Oct 2024
Elections (Integrity of Online Advertising) (Amendment) Act 2024
Bans publishing digitally manipulated content (AI or conventional editing) that realistically depicts candidates saying or doing things they did not, from issue of the writ until close of polling.
Penalty individuals: up to SGD 1,000 fine and/or 12 months' jail; non-compliant social media services: up to SGD 1m - VoluntaryStandard · not bindingAdopted 2022
AI Verify testing framework and toolkit (AI Verify Foundation)
Open-source testing framework mapped to international AI governance principles.
- VoluntaryGuidance · not bindingAdopted Jan 2020
Model AI Governance Framework (2nd ed.) and Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI
Voluntary governance practices; GenAI edition (May 2024) covers nine dimensions incl. accountability, content provenance and safety testing.
1 more item is awaiting verification. We publish a law only after confirming its status and dates against an official source; until then it earns no Rulebook points.
The Rulebook score, line by line
What each line means →40 of 100. Each line names the law or body that earns its points.
- Binding AI rulesNo AI-specific law, bill or official draft0/35
- A national AI strategy, adopted or updated since 2022See Institutions8/8
- A body named to oversee or enforce AI rulesSee Institutions6/6
- An AI safety or evaluation instituteSee Institutions6/6
- A right to challenge automated decisions, in forceNone found0/12
- Rules on AI-generated content: labels or deepfake offences, in forceElections (Integrity of Online Advertising) (Amendment) Act 202413/13
- International AI governance initiatives endorsed (of 8)5 of 8. Source: AI governance initiatives by country7.5/12
- Council of Europe AI Convention: signed 5, ratified 8Not signed0/8
The record
What gets an entry →Every dated step: laws adopted and coming into force, and each reading of AI use. Newest first; future dates are marked.
- 30 Jun 2026AdoptionAI user share reached 64.3%, from 63.4% in Q1 2026Share of people aged 15–64 who used a generative AI product, Q2 2026.
- 29 Jun 2026LawsOnline Safety (Relief and Accountability) Act 2025 came into force
- 31 Mar 2026AdoptionAI user share reached 63.4%, from 60.9% in H2 2025Share of people aged 15–64 who used a generative AI product, Q1 2026.
- 22 Jan 2026LawsModel AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI adoptedVoluntary guidance on risk bounding, human accountability, technical controls and end-user responsibility for AI agents.
- 31 Dec 2025AdoptionAI user share reached 60.9%, from 58.6% in H1 2025Share of people aged 15–64 who used a generative AI product, H2 2025.
- 5 Nov 2025LawsOnline Safety (Relief and Accountability) Act 2025 adoptedCreates a Commissioner of Online Safety and Online Safety Commission that can order takedowns or account restrictions, plus statutory torts against posters, administrators and platforms; first phase covers 5 of 13 harms …
- 15 Oct 2024LawsElections (Integrity of Online Advertising) (Amendment) Act 2024 adoptedBans publishing digitally manipulated content (AI or conventional editing) that realistically depicts candidates saying or doing things they did not, from issue of the writ until close of polling.
- 2022LawsAI Verify testing framework and toolkit (AI Verify Foundation) adoptedOpen-source testing framework mapped to international AI governance principles.
- Jan 2020LawsModel AI Governance Framework (2nd ed.) and Model AI Governance Framework… adoptedVoluntary governance practices; GenAI edition (May 2024) covers nine dimensions incl. accountability, content provenance and safety testing.
How people in Singapore see AI
Public opinion on AI →Survey results, not scored. They show the mood that new AI rules land in.
Singapore beside its peers
All 40 countries →The two Progress leaders and the countries nearest to Singapore in its region. A dash means no source measures that lens for the country.
Progressfive lenses, 0–10053#477#174#251#649#841#11
Adoptionlens score775656723923
Talentlens score6552—613118
Researchlens score498983177553
Investmentlens score5010074585149
Infrastructurelens score278883475062
Rulebook0–100407484348957
AI user shareQ2 2026 · Microsoft64.3%33.0%17.5%18.5%40.6%24.7%
Approach to AI lawExisting regulators, no AI statuteState laws, no federal AI statuteBinding rules by use caseExisting regulators, no AI statuteComprehensive AI lawPromotion law, no penalties
Follow Singapore
The AI numbers worth knowing, every Friday.
The week in AI numbers is one email on Fridays with the new charts across every theme, each linked to its source. Following Singapore also tells us which countries you want to hear more about.
You're subscribed. Manage your email
Free, one email a week. Choose what you follow →More of Asia-Pacific
Every country →India51Progress34RulebookExisting regulators, no AI statuteOpen tracker →China74Progress84RulebookBinding rules by use caseOpen tracker →South Korea49Progress89RulebookComprehensive AI lawOpen tracker →Japan41Progress57RulebookPromotion law, no penaltiesOpen tracker →Taiwan18Progress53RulebookPromotion law, no penaltiesOpen tracker →Vietnam10Progress43RulebookComprehensive AI lawOpen tracker →
Malaysia10Progress11RulebookStrategy and guidance
Indonesia13Progress36RulebookStrategy and guidanceOpen tracker →Australia37Progress44RulebookExisting regulators, no AI statuteOpen tracker →New Zealand11Progress14RulebookStrategy and guidanceOpen tracker →Check AI-law news yourself
All our data sources →Every law on these pages links to its official text and to an independent check. These are the registers and trackers we use, with what each is good for. A headline about a new AI law is real when the official register shows it.
Official registers8
- EUR-LexOfficial EU law: the AI Act and its amendments
- Council of Europe Treaty OfficeSignatures and ratifications of the AI Convention (CETS 225)
- Federal RegisterUS executive orders and agency rules
- Congress.govUS federal bills and their status
- legislation.gov.ukUK Acts and statutory instruments
- Cyberspace Administration of ChinaChina's AI rules and the generative AI filing register
- e-Gov JapanJapanese statutes, including the AI Promotion Act
- Korea Law Information CenterKorean statutes, including the AI Basic Act
Law and policy trackers4
- OECD.AI Policy Navigator (formerly National AI Policies & Strategies database; GAIIN)OECDNational AI policy initiatives (strategies, governance bodies, funding, regulation) by jurisdictionUse it for Use as primary verification source for 'national AI strategy exists / date' and governance bodies; link each country page to its OECD.AI country profile
- IAPP Global AI Law and Policy TrackerIAPP (International Association of Privacy Professionals)AI laws, policies, national strategies and responsible authorities per jurisdictionUse it for Cite as a secondary legal cross-check; link out; do not reproduce
- Council of Europe Framework Convention (CETS 225) treaty chartCouncil of Europe Treaty Office · Live chart (see coe_convention block)Signature and ratification status of the first binding international AI treatyUse it for Primary source for a 'CoE AI Convention: signed / ratified' field per country
- Digital Policy AlertDigital Policy Alert (St.Gallen Endowment for Prosperity through Trade) · ContinuousEvent-level tracker of digital policy changes incl. AI rules, by jurisdictionUse it for Use as verification source for law-stage changes; model aiadoption.org's country timeline on its event structure
Country indices11
- Stanford HAI AI Index Report + Global AI Vibrancy ToolStanford Institute for Human-Centered AIAnnual state-of-AI report; Vibrancy Tool ranks national AI ecosystems (R&D, economy, policy, talent, infrastructure, public opinion, etc.)Use it for Reuse individual underlying indicators (with attribution) rather than the composite; link to Vibrancy Tool for each covered country
- Tortoise Global AI IndexTortoise MediaNational AI capacity: investment, innovation, implementationUse it for Link out and quote rank with attribution only; do not reuse scores
- Oxford Insights Government AI Readiness Index 2025Oxford InsightsWhether governments can harness AI for the public goodUse it for Cite as a verification source for governance/policy-capacity; reuse rank with attribution for countries lacking other data
- Microsoft Global AI Diffusion Report (AI user share)Microsoft (AI Economy Institute / On the Issues)AI user share: % of working-age population (15-64) using generative AI products in the periodUse it for Reuse the per-country AI user share as the core 'adoption' metric with attribution and vintage label; flag method breaks
- IMF AI Preparedness Index (AIPI)International Monetary Fund · June 2024 (released 25 June 2024); no later update foundMacro-structural readiness to adopt AIUse it for Use as background 'structural readiness' component only; label vintage 2024
- Global Index on Responsible AI (GIRAI)Global Center on AI GovernanceGovernment commitments and implementation evidence for responsible AIUse it for Cite as verification source for responsible-AI governance; adopt its framework-vs-implementation distinction in aiadoption.org's law status pills
- AI Safety / Security Institutes network (NAAIMES)Member governments; UK AI Security Institute as coordinatorMembership of the international network of AI safety/evaluation institutesUse it for Field 'has national AI evaluation institute (year)' per country; see safety_institutes block
- Carnegie Endowment (AI governance research, e.g. China AI safety institute work)Carnegie Endowment for International Peace · Ongoing researchQualitative country analysis of AI governanceUse it for Cite for country narrative paragraphs
- Brookings: How are countries evaluating AI models?Brookings Institution · Article (date not confirmed)Comparative analysis of national AI evaluation institutesUse it for Cite in safety-institute methodology notes
- Anthropic Economic Index - geographic report (Anthropic AI Usage Index)AnthropicClaude usage per capita relative to working-age population by country (AUI), plus task mixUse it for Use as secondary adoption metric beside Microsoft; triangulate, never sole sourceLink not yet opened by us
- Epoch AI dataEpoch AI · ContinuousNotable models, training compute, GPU clusters/data centres by countryUse it for Reuse 'notable models by country' and 'AI supercomputers by country' with attributionLink not yet opened by us
Research and safety4
- CSET (Center for Security and Emerging Technology)Georgetown University · OngoingData-driven research on AI talent, investment, compute, policy (incl. ETO tools such as AGORA AI governance document set)Use it for Cite AGORA for law-text links; reuse open datasets with attributionLink not yet opened by us
- International AI Safety ReportExpert panel chaired by Yoshua Bengio, UK-backed secretariat · 2026 edition expected/early 2026 (not verified)Scientific synthesis of general-purpose AI capabilities and risksUse it for Cite in methodology for why safety institutes/evaluation capacity are scored; list which countries sit on the panelLink not yet opened by us
- Our World in Data - Artificial IntelligenceOur World in Data (Global Change Data Lab) · ContinuousCharts republishing AI data (investment, models, patents, public opinion) by countryUse it for Model chart UX on OWID; reuse CC BY datasets with attributionLink not yet opened by us
- Artificial AnalysisArtificial Analysis · ContinuousModel benchmarks, price and speed; includes model origin by countryUse it for Use for 'frontier models produced by country' cross-check; citeLink not yet opened by us
How the scores work
Two scores, never added together. Download every score and indicator (CSV).
Progress, 0–100
- Five lenses, same for everyone. Adoption, Talent, Research, Investment and Infrastructure. Each lens is the average of its indicators; Progress is the average of the lenses.
- Only published numbers. Each indicator is a chart on AI Adoption with its source and CSV, or a public dataset linked on the page (Microsoft AI Diffusion, Epoch AI GPU Clusters).
- Scaled so outliers do not swamp the rest. Money, models and compute use a log scale on which the leader scores 100; shares and rates use the range of countries the source covers.
- Gaps stay gaps. A source that does not cover a country leaves a dash, never a guess. A country below a source's top-15 list scores 0 on that indicator, and the page says so. The coverage flag shows how many of the 17 indicators measure the country.
Rulebook, 0–100
How complete and binding a country's AI rules are. It does not grade whether the rules are good, strict or lenient. Points come only from laws we have verified against an official source.
Binding AI rulesup to 35
- An AI law with enforceable duties on companies applies now35
- Enforceable rules on AI systems apply, but only in part of the country26
- An AI law with enforceable duties is enacted; its duties start later26
- A national AI law is in force, but it sets no penalties for companies20
- An AI bill or official draft is before the legislature or out for consultation10
- No AI-specific law, bill or official draft0
Institutions, safeguards, international65
- A national AI strategy, adopted or updated since 20228
- A body named to oversee or enforce AI rules6
- An AI safety or evaluation institute6
- A right to challenge automated decisions, in force12
- Rules on AI-generated content: labels or deepfake offences, in force13
- International AI governance initiatives endorsed (of 8)12
- Council of Europe AI Convention: signed 5, ratified 88
Disclosure: AI Adoption uses AI tools in its research and editorial work. No government, company or lobby group has any say in a country's scores or its law register, and the same rules apply to every country. Editorial standards · Data sources · Corrections